Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pyros Nine's avatar

Socialize the costs, privatize the profits- but now socialize the cost of babymaking too. It's also telling how key industries are described as "dying'- less need for formula, lest need for babyfood, less need for all the industries that prey on motherhood and childcare- the sure bet that next year there'd be net growth because more babies were born compared to last year is hurting all the right people in the wallet.

The weirdest thing, after reading this article about a Investor capitalist going crazy and salted earthwarfare against an IVF surrogate whose babe was stillborn, and the obvious accounts of CEOs and billionaries spending money to have essentially concubines and numerous prospective mothers for their children, is their attempts to somehow fix the population decline on their own, or at least somehow work it that "their' culture of wealth might increase while all others decline for some shift of future ownership. But also increasingly how they're trying to itemize and invest in motherhood much like one would a stock or crypto- pump money and resources into it, hope for an investment, and enshittify natural processes- women with working wombs become commodities, not people- the ability to have a baby becomes a work requirement and not a trait tangential to work or life. If we could grow babies in tanks, the wealthy would, but for now, they want to treat women like those tanks, and then charge men the luxury of access to them- literally seizing the means of reproduction.

I honestly think the wealthier someone becomes, the more they see people as things- buyers and sellers, data points. "How do make number go up?" but for people. Or seeing us all as a CIV game, "maybe if I, as an eternal godking, were to put points into this CIV tree..."

Expand full comment

No posts