a proton here, a proton there…

The heavier your atoms are, they faster they decay. But why? There's a reason why the more protons you add to a nucleus, the harder it is to keep the atom together.

mess of wires

Last week, I wrote about the newest addition to the periodic table of elements, a synthetic atom created in a heavy ion collider for the purpose of seeing how many protons and neutrons you could squeeze together and still have a nucleus that can hold itself together, if only for an instant. And in the case of Element 112, we really do mean an instant since its half-life is just a few hundred microseconds.

But why do some atoms generally tend to have shorter and shorter half-lives as their atomic numbers get higher and higher? And why do just a few upward notches along the way produce radical differences in how the resulting elements behave?

When we mention the atomic number of an element, what we're really talking about is the number of protons in its atoms' nuclei. Of course, you can't just put protons together and expect to create a stable structure. The particles will have the same spin and charge, which means that the electrostatic repulsion between them will be too much to overcome with the strong nuclear force.

You need neutrons to keep the nucleus intact and as the number of protons increases, you'll need more and more neutrons to balance out their mutual repulsion. Eventually, as you move down the periodic table you'll find bismuth which has 83 protons and 126 neutrons, a configuration currently thought to be the heaviest stable nuclear composition. After that, all the elements we're aware of become radioactive, starting with the 84 proton and 125 neutron polonium.

Ordinarily, in a stable atom, the strong nuclear force would keep the nucleus intact. But in a radioactive atom, there's not enough binding energy to stop it from decaying. The heavier the atom and the more protons it has, the harder it is to stabilize and as the atomic number creeps upward, we cross certain thresholds for just how stable the isotopes we discover would be. This is why just one more proton creates a radioactive substance, another ten create elements with drastically shorter half-lives than the ones preceding them, and eleven more cut down those half-lives further still.

  archived from wowt
              
# science // atom / chemistry / subatomic particles


  show comments
latest reads

why mediocrity is fascism's best friend

We like to think that brutal dictatorships and fascist regimes need monsters. In reality, they just need a handful of resentful, amoral paper pushers.
why mediocrity is fascism's best friend

anthropic to users: don't bully claude

Anthropic new policy against "abusive or cruel behavior" towards its chatbot sounds absurd. It may not be as stupid as social media thinks.
anthropic to users: don't bully claude

when all the world dissolves: chapter 1

Welcome to the distant future. Nature has recovered. Humanity? Not so much.
when all the world dissolves: chapter 1

e-con-omics: why everyone is lying to you and each other

The reason why today's economy feels like an ongoing scam is because, well, it kind of, sort of is. But don't worry, it's perfectly legal. And very lucrative.
e-con-omics: why everyone is lying to you and each other

exploring the end of the world on a dare

A new, chaotic, deranged, post-apocalyptic adventure is coming to a cyberpunk and future-oriented newsletter near you...
exploring the end of the world on a dare

the tech bro's guide to rediscovering everything

Tech influencers keep rediscovering decades old research in their quest to reinvent the world with only the power of hubris and a few lines of code.
the tech bro's guide to rediscovering everything