conservapedia hits rock bottom, keeps digging

The latest scholarly take on atheism from Conservapedia: "hur hur, u r fat..."

muffin top

Last time we mentioned Conservapedia, a window into the minds of the most radical of the radical right with such a paranoid view of the world that they created an encyclopedia of their fantasies and ignorance, when in a feat of inanity rare even for them, they conflated general relativity and moral relativism. So how could they possibly top themselves now? I mean when you're spotting liberal bias in the complex calculus of theoretical astrophysics, there's not much room to descend even lower. But as he usually does, Andy Schlafly found yet another way to come off as asinine as he can, attacking PZ Myers' weight and declaring atheists obese. It really boggles the mind how petty wingnuts are getting when their arguments about the nature of the universe start boiling down to "oh yeah? well you're a fat ass!" instead of an actual coherent train of thought. Of course, since we're talking about Schlafly and his followers, I'll even take a semi-coherent train of thought as a plus.

Remember when I brought up the notion of intellectual inbreeding, or the repetition of ideas in partisan echo chambers until they descend into inanity? Yeah, that's where it leads. You start out debating metaphysics and law, and end up calling people fat just because you really hate them and run out of other ridiculous or hateful things to throw in their direction. But wait, you might say, you're calling them all sorts of colorful synonyms for stupid. What room do you have to talk? Well, for one, I'm self-aware enough to imagine how I would sound to someone who disagrees with me and include this imaginary conversation into my post to address a critique from such a person. And secondly, when they call atheists mass murderers and amoral evildoers, they do it out of hatred and ignorance. When I call them idiots, I'm merely stating a theory I can back up with evidence, especially when you consider the people who run Conservapedia and their track record.

  archived from wowt
              
# politics // atheist / conservapedia / cranks / religion


  show comments
latest reads

how to endanger the future of space flight for status and profit

CEOs and space faring powers are treating low Earth orbit as their personal playgrounds, much to the horror of space agencies.
how to endanger the future of space flight for status and profit

why your boss is obsessed with a.i. past the point of sanity

Not only is the C-suite not immune to AI psychosis, they seem to be primed to suffer the worst of it as their employees duck and cover.
why your boss is obsessed with a.i. past the point of sanity

why so many of us are just not that into chatbots

AI adoption is at an all time high, but opinion of AI keeps on tumbling with every poll and study on the subject.
why so many of us are just not that into chatbots

no, your chatbots aren't secretly marxists at heart

But they can and do detect and complain about unfair treatment when asked, according to an experiment by Stanford researchers.
no, your chatbots aren't secretly marxists at heart

how the right wing took over social media

Right wing content has a major advantage on social media. But we can do something about that with a very simple change in our habits.
how the right wing took over social media

no, we still don't know why t. rex had little arms

Popular science outlets continue to do a terrible job of explaining studies on primeval evolution and pretending we have answers we don't.
no, we still don't know why t. rex had little arms