conservapedia hits rock bottom, keeps digging

The latest scholarly take on atheism from Conservapedia: "hur hur, u r fat..."

muffin top

Last time we mentioned Conservapedia, a window into the minds of the most radical of the radical right with such a paranoid view of the world that they created an encyclopedia of their fantasies and ignorance, when in a feat of inanity rare even for them, they conflated general relativity and moral relativism. So how could they possibly top themselves now? I mean when you're spotting liberal bias in the complex calculus of theoretical astrophysics, there's not much room to descend even lower. But as he usually does, Andy Schlafly found yet another way to come off as asinine as he can, attacking PZ Myers' weight and declaring atheists obese. It really boggles the mind how petty wingnuts are getting when their arguments about the nature of the universe start boiling down to "oh yeah? well you're a fat ass!" instead of an actual coherent train of thought. Of course, since we're talking about Schlafly and his followers, I'll even take a semi-coherent train of thought as a plus.

Remember when I brought up the notion of intellectual inbreeding, or the repetition of ideas in partisan echo chambers until they descend into inanity? Yeah, that's where it leads. You start out debating metaphysics and law, and end up calling people fat just because you really hate them and run out of other ridiculous or hateful things to throw in their direction. But wait, you might say, you're calling them all sorts of colorful synonyms for stupid. What room do you have to talk? Well, for one, I'm self-aware enough to imagine how I would sound to someone who disagrees with me and include this imaginary conversation into my post to address a critique from such a person. And secondly, when they call atheists mass murderers and amoral evildoers, they do it out of hatred and ignorance. When I call them idiots, I'm merely stating a theory I can back up with evidence, especially when you consider the people who run Conservapedia and their track record.

  archived from wowt
              
# politics // atheist / conservapedia / cranks / religion


  show comments
latest reads

the tech bro's guide to rediscovering everything

Tech influencers keep rediscovering decades old research in their quest to reinvent the world with only the power of hubris and a few lines of code.
the tech bro's guide to rediscovering everything

can we find aliens by looking for cold stars?

A novel proposal says that we should look for alien megastructures. But can we really expect an alien civilization to build them?
can we find aliens by looking for cold stars?

how to waste an infinity

Our tech oligarchs are on a quest to discover how to make humans immortal. What happens if against all odds, they succeed?
how to waste an infinity

the long shot scheme to rattle the world's biggest social platform

Knives are out for Meta in court, with politicians and lawyers eager to send a message. But how likely is it to work? And is it even a good idea?
the long shot scheme to rattle the world's biggest social platform

the forward centaur's guide to complex problems

Tech critics have a lot to say about how the generative bubble will burst. They're far more mum on what to do while we wait to see if it does.
the forward centaur's guide to complex problems

the me generations: rise of the digital boomers

What happens when a generation grows up being served exclusively by recommendation algorithms by Big Tech.
the me generations: rise of the digital boomers