strange questions and stranger answers

According to some researchers, "hey baby, that's a nice... uh... belly button you got there?" is the hot new pickup line we should be considering.

lingerie ad

Sometimes, you read about a certain line of research and wonder why exactly it's being reported as a newsworthy event, and why the scientists behind it think it's worth perusing. For example, take this quote from an article on Live Science

"I propose that umbilicus, together with the surrounding skin area, is an honest signal of individual vigor," Sinkkonen wrote in the latest issue of The FASEB Journal. "More precisely, I suggest that the symmetry, shape, and position of umbilicus can be used to estimate the reproductive potential of fertile females, including risks of certain genetically and maternally inherited fetal anomalies."

Huh? You can tell all that by looking at a woman's belly button based on a few studies in which people were asked to evaluate what navel shapes were most aesthetically pleasing to them? How exactly does navel shape and fertility correlate? And what would belly button shapes tell about men? Would they hint at sperm production and hormone levels? Something just doesn't sound quite right here and the evidence is rather lacking. The only thing we have to go by is the conclusion that because humans have a very pronounced umbilical scar, it must mean something or it wouldn't be there. That question might make sense at first, but it's not really meaningful when we consider the random nature of evolution.

Could it be that the first humans just happened to be born with these umbilical scars and because it was entirely benign, the processes that created them carried on for hundreds of thousands of generations? Considering that randomness is how nature diversifies and organisms become more and more complex, we probably shouldn't rush to find an explanation for how everything in our anatomy must be crucially important. In fact, that has a slight hint of the "irreducible complexity" argument of ID proponents.

Obviously, scientists should ask why we have pronounced belly buttons or exactly five fingers or toes. Some of the most profound research is often done by asking seemingly bizarre questions. But we should make sure that the explanations being given make sense in a broad context. Just ask yourself, when was the last time your partner's belly button shape sealed the deal for you?

  archived from wowt
              
# science // evolution / evolutionary biology / human evolution / humans


  show comments
latest reads

the xenonite plot armor of project hail mary

Hail Mary was a badly mismanaged, rushed death trap driven by groupthink and politics, and Ryland Grace was right to balk at the idea.
the xenonite plot armor of project hail mary

how ai can love bomb you into being an asshole

In ads, chatbots are omniscient arbiters and truth brokers. In practice, they're sycophantic enablers according to the latest research.
how ai can love bomb you into being an asshole

why we're all getting meaner and meaner online

Yes, being a professional asshole is now a viable career option. Which is awful news for online discourse.
why we're all getting meaner and meaner online

how and why corporate jargon and technobabble lull the mind

Yes, sadly, some of the worst stereotypes about corporate culture really are true.
how and why corporate jargon and technobabble lull the mind

the great theoretical chatbot job apocalypse

According to Anthropic, LLMs can obliterate most white collar jobs. Well, theoretically...
the great theoretical chatbot job apocalypse

i prompt, therefore i am: how tech forgot about human agency

Tone deaf tech bros no longer seem to understand that their pitch for AI is fundamentally dystopian and dismissive.
i prompt, therefore i am: how tech forgot about human agency