For some inexplicable reason, Nature decided to publish a paranoid parable about tyrannical New Atheists lobotomizing Christians into depression and loneliness.

The modern world needs blasphemy not just as abstract right, but being actively exercised when the occasion calls for it.

Chris Steadman and the (Non)Prophet Blog are very upset at my criticism and are ready to diligently dodge every one of my arguments.

The (Non)Prophet blog has a contest for the atheists least likely to offend religious zealots and whose identity is based on how accommodating to their beliefs they are.

Just to answer the questions, no, I'm not interested in participating in the branding and sale of Atheism BrandTM Atheism...

Professor Massimo Pigliucci is trying to make a case for accommodating believers railing against science and fact-based education and discourse with some very flimsy arguments...

According to David Scharfenberg, Ken Miller is the only sane, rational person in the debate about how evolution should be taught, a debate led almost exclusively by foaming-at-the-mouth irrational extremists on both sides.

Indiana governor Mitch Daniels teaches a master class in mindless, empty, hostile zealotry and stringing together supposedly fear-inducing buzzwords.

Theologian Stephen Prothero would be happy to engage atheists. He'd just like them to be attractive ladies his age and type...

The AAI chose to ride the fame of an atheist anti-vaccine and alt med crank instead of awarding someone who actually advances science and skepticism.

Religious commentators are trying to soothe scared believers that atheism is just a fad. In reality, skepticism of organized religion is quickly growing.

After Stalin's crackdowns were over, the USSR was a lot less hostile to religion than Americans are often taught.

Atheism should not become bizarro theism, even though it's human nature for it to lean in that direction.