Serious publications should not give creationists the time of day. Their reputations are at stake.

The Three Stooges of creationism are at it again, now over at Forbes for some inexplicable reason.

The famed naturalist and father of evolution is getting the worst birthday present this year.

What would it take for a creature to become creationism's long-sought "intelligent designer?"

Scientifically-illiterate politicians should not be deciding how science will be taught in schools.

If Intelligent Design wants to be taken like a serious science, it needs to learn to follow the basics of the scientific method.

Creationists deliberately don't understand transitional fossils. But to be fair, the whole concept is somewhat flawed...

Just how much should we be allowed to discuss creationism in science class? It depends who's discussing it and why.

Intelligent Design is attacking a convenient strawman, not the theory of evolution.