Atheists will not outshout religious zealots because the zealots will drag them down to a reality and fact-free screaming match and beat them with experience.

Celebrity-driven organized skepticism is becoming a loud, partisan, and political disaster.

Cranks looking to debate serious scientists and scholars aren't looking to have a discussion. They shouldn't be given a platform and legitimacy by proxy.

Cranks, quacks, and peddlers of woo would love for skeptics to tone down their criticism. In fact, they'd like us to stop it completely.

Often times, the loudest defenders of a belief aren't trying to convince you. They're trying to convince themselves.

Sometimes ideas advocated as dangerous and subversive are just poorly thought out notions in search of better marketing.

In sparing the feeling of religious zealots and ardent believers of junk science, we've done ourselves no favors.

Tomorrow, it's Weird Things vs. transhumanist George Dvorksy on Skeptically Speaking.

In an ironic turn of events, accommodationist Massimo Pigliucci gets lambasted for being offensive to believers for writing a book about separating junk science and belief from fact.

With friends like accommodationists, science advocates don't need any enemies.

Chris Steadman and the (Non)Prophet Blog are very upset at my criticism and are ready to diligently dodge every one of my arguments.

How to argue like a creationist in one easy, dishonest, and willfully ignorant step.

Global warming deniers demonstrate that a little bit of knowledge mixed with lots of willful obfuscation is a very dangerous and unreasonable thing.

Partisan tribalism is so toxic, it can indirectly influence people to vote against their best interests just to make a statement.

This blog's creationist readers appear to need a reminder the criticizing their statements is not the same thing as disagreeing with a deity.