#peer review


# science    

why we have to abandon the popular "lone genius" narrative of science

Writers constantly tell us about mavericks whose genius overturned the status quo. Their stories aren't just wrong, they're dangerous.
why we have to abandon the popular "lone genius" narrative of science

# science    

much ado about reproducing social science experiments

A project to replicate studies it found problematic is running into its own replication problems and not following experimental designs.
much ado about reproducing social science experiments

# science    

hell hath no fury like a scientist scorned by bad peer review…

Peer review and editorial input at PLOS ONE are in trouble and scientists are very, very upset.
hell hath no fury like a scientist scorned by bad peer review…

# science    

science is broken, long live science

Over-quantification and commodification of research is encouraging bad behavior and slowing down scientists.
science is broken, long live science

# science    

anatomy of a politically painful fraud

Michael LaCour's groundbreaking study on how just talking to an LGBT person could change homophobic attitudes was a fraud. But why did it take so longer to uncover it and what does it mean for other researchers?
anatomy of a politically painful fraud

# science    

when doing agenda science, threaten to sue your critics

The author of the roundly criticized anti-GMO study appeared to know it wouldn't be well received, which is why he threatened to sue any vocal critic before the publication date.
when doing agenda science, threaten to sue your critics

# science    

when bad science, mass media, and luddism mix

Anti-GMO activists are defending an extremely flawed study with all their bad faith rhetorical guns blazing.
when bad science, mass media, and luddism mix

# science    

why retractions aren't really a bad thing

Don't worry about retractions or bad papers being discovered by scientists trying to build on and replicate each other's work. That's exactly how science advances.
why retractions aren't really a bad thing

# science    

for the good of science, publish your code?

Publishing code used in scientific studies sounds like a good idea, but its implementation and consequences need a lot more thought first...
for the good of science, publish your code?

# science    

the amazing, gyrating theory of everything

A viral theory-of-everything manifesto is raising eyebrows of scientists and pop sci writers with one questions: how could it get published in a peer-reviewed journal?
the amazing, gyrating theory of everything

# science    

watching the end of an eccentric's journal

The Journal of Cosmology is closing its doors. Bloggers relying on clicks from picking apart deeply flawed studies are devastated.
watching the end of an eccentric's journal

# science    

yeah, about those arsenic-absorbing microbes…

It seems that the NASA-backed research into arsenic-eating microbes had a number of serious flaws that has biologists scratching their heads.
yeah, about those arsenic-absorbing microbes…

# science    

what krakens can teach us about peer review

Peer review, long seen as a feature of any scientific endeavor, is actually a fairly new idea. And you wouldn't believe the stuff that got published as science before it was put in place...
what krakens can teach us about peer review

# science    

when everybody is an expert

Got an idea the scientific community isn't listening to? Forget more research and peer review! Go to the people with a conspiracy theory!
when everybody is an expert