If you want to understand how science works, you have to understand the connection between a scientific theory and facts.

Debates are only as good as all the participants' attitudes towards finding a common ground.

The Discovery Institute once again proves it's incapable of having a good faith debate or argument.

Creationists won't change their minds or the subject, so why engage them? Because our future is on the line.

What would it take for a creature to become creationism's long-sought "intelligent designer?"

Despite its partially random nature, evolution does offer concrete, falsifiable predictions.

"Irreducible complexity" sounds scientific, but doesn't actually mean anything. So how can it be the result of an experiment?