why the world's tallest mountains might be hundreds of miles under our feet

Determining the tallest mountains on Earth seems like a fairly straightforward task, but it actually depends on which mountains you measure and how you measure them...

earth structure cutaway

If you're looking for the tallest mountains on Earth, you need to go to the Himalayas, formed in the aftermath of the Indian subcontinent slamming into Asia and creating a saber-shaped scar that's home to most of the world's highest peaks, including Everest, the tallest mountain on the planet's surface if we measure from sea level. If you measure from the center of the Earth and include every imperfection and deformation of the planet's shape, the world's tallest mountain would be Chimborazo in Ecuador. Measure from the bottom of the seafloor in a volcanic island chain, and the title goes to Hawaii's Mauna Kea.

But all three mountains, and Everest's impressive siblings may be dwarfed by the upside down mountain ranges 660 kilometers under the surface, at a boundary separating the partially molten upper mantle from the high pressure, solid lower mantle.We know they exist by monitoring how seismic waves generated by powerful earthquakes travel through the planet, like the 8.2 quake that rocked Bolivia in 1994 and was recorded by seismographs all over the world. As the waves travel through different densities of rock, water, and magma, they produce different signals and the result is basically a geological sonogram.

When the data was replicated on a cluster of supercomputers, it showed that the mantle wasn't just smoothly mixing between layers and hinted that the upper mantle had a number of complex features which may indicate the fate of rocks subducted under larger tectonic plates hundreds of millions, if not billions of years ago. This finding shows us that using the ever growing array of seismographs tuned to quakes that register a 7.0 or above on the Richter scale, we can more thoroughly scour Earth's innards and answer complex questions about what's going on inside our planet, and what happened hundreds of millions of years ago as supercontinents broke up, merged, then broke up again in 500 million year cycles.

Unless you're a geologist, this discovery, and further research probing deeper into the Earth's structure, probably won't mean that much to you or your understanding of how the planets' layers are differentiated. But it may have implications for modeling the formation of alien worlds around other stars and could help us find potential habitats from extraterrestrial life. These far off planets would be formed in much the same way as ours, and at this point, pretty much any insight into the fine details of that process would be welcome, no matter how obscure or specific it might seem at first glance. And really, it's just cool to know more about what's happening with the 5.9 sextillion tons of solid and molten rock and metal under our feet.

  archived from wowt
              
# science // earth / geology / mantle


  show comments
latest reads

how to endanger the future of space flight for status and profit

CEOs and space faring powers are treating low Earth orbit as their personal playgrounds, much to the horror of space agencies.
how to endanger the future of space flight for status and profit

why your boss is obsessed with a.i. past the point of sanity

Not only is the C-suite not immune to AI psychosis, they seem to be primed to suffer the worst of it as their employees duck and cover.
why your boss is obsessed with a.i. past the point of sanity

why so many of us are just not that into chatbots

AI adoption is at an all time high, but opinion of AI keeps on tumbling with every poll and study on the subject.
why so many of us are just not that into chatbots

no, your chatbots aren't secretly marxists at heart

But they can and do detect and complain about unfair treatment when asked, according to an experiment by Stanford researchers.
no, your chatbots aren't secretly marxists at heart

how the right wing took over social media

Right wing content has a major advantage on social media. But we can do something about that with a very simple change in our habits.
how the right wing took over social media

no, we still don't know why t. rex had little arms

Popular science outlets continue to do a terrible job of explaining studies on primeval evolution and pretending we have answers we don't.
no, we still don't know why t. rex had little arms