South Korea reverses its creationist-friendly course after consulting with scientists over the contents of its school textbooks.

Why do creationists insist on demanding evidence that's been produced so many times over?

South Korea inexplicably allows its creationists to censor passages about evolution in science textbooks.

Creationists expect science to tell them soothing tales about their place in the universe. That's just not going to happen.

Accommodationist philosopher Michael Ruse is now seriously defending the citizens of Tennessee voting on science and facts.

Intelligent Design was a compromise no one wanted and the wrong answer to a question no one even asked.

Egged on by cranks and quacks, the media seems obsessed with how nice someone is instead of whether what they're saying makes any sense.

Creationists and the school boards who either bow to them or are ran by them, are busy intimidating teachers into not teaching the science of evolution.

Argument from a persecution complex is not a persuasive way to defend creationism. Or anything, for that matter...

The man who spent his career dismissing evolution as a faith which scientists were bullied into following is now being threatened by his bosses for disagreeing with young Earth creationism.

Far too many commentators are way too eager to explain to scientists and science writers why creationism is still a thing. It would be nice if their explanations were actually rooted in the real world.

The Discovery Institute needs a scapegoat for everything wrong with the world today. And surprise, surprise, it's always Darwin's fault.

The only argument creationists have against speciation is deploying arbitrary taxonomical semantics.

The Discovery Institute thinks it has JPL dead to rights for demoting a vocal creationist. But the case is a little more complicated than that...

S.E. Cupp's profound insight: if liberals agree with the tenets of evolution, teaching science must be a conspiracy to destroy America.