Ancient astronaut theory is basically creationism for people who don't believe in the supernatural, as Lloyd Pye demonstrates.

Another entry in the quickly growing HuffPo library of woo shows that all creationism is basically the same in the end.

Since Dembski considered it beneath him to answer my design question, someone else tries to take a shot at them.

A few questions for the Great Creationist Information Theory Wizard William Albert Dembski about the design of the human body and genome.

Like a phoenix of nonsense, Michael Behe rises from the ashes of being proved wrong on his terms and with his conditions by pretending that the exact opposite has happened.

Bill Dembski decided to fight evolution using that most scientific of methods: asking his students to troll science bloggers.

Creationists think evolution is either nonexistent or some sort of deity-guided progression towards perfection. The reality is much more of a mixed bag...

BioLogos is determined to bridge the divides between science and religion by... well, avoiding any topic of substance.

A quick dive into a brick wall of stupidity... err... the backwards logic of Ray Comfort.

How to lie with statistics, creationist style.

"Irreducible complexity" sounds scientific, but doesn't actually mean anything. So how can it be the result of an experiment?

It's hard to explain something when you're being explicitly paid not to understand how it works...

Intelligent Design is attacking a convenient strawman, not the theory of evolution.